Combining Existence as well as Artwork within Satellite TV and Movies.

You realize how they say art reflects life, and life reflects art? I’ve been noticing that more and more lately. Actually, in a variety of ways I have been noticing mirror effects with all kinds of images bouncing off one another. It’s like Russian dolls stacked inside one another, except they never get any smaller. If you want to see the movies and TV shows that watch in a new light, try taking into consideration the relationships of films alive, and of yourself as a viewer to the finished, polished product.

Obviously, people are usually making movies based real-life stories. Sports events make particularly good material. The characters derive from real those who actually went through these experiences. Does which means that it’s all fact? I get the impression that there’s more going on than simply people telling stories about “what really happened.” In the 90s two movies arrived on the scene, almost in the same year, about the famous long-distance runner, Steve Prefontaine, one was called Without Limits and another was called Prefontaine. Each movie has the same basic plot, and needless to say the reality have to match up – the races he won, the times he made, his tragically premature death – and yet they portray wildly different worlds. Which biopic about this sports legend, then, is more true?

Each person involved with interpreting “real life” – whether writer, director, actor, or viewer – naturally inserts a few of their own art right into a story. In Without Limits, Donald Sutherland was cast in the role of Prefontaine and was wanting to artfully portray real life, and yet Sutherland’s own life-experiences and skill as an actor were bound to influence the art as well. Along with that, the viewer adds another layer, sitting in a movie or facing an HD TV, watching from the real-world as a piece of art – a movie – unfolds a tale about real life. As though it wasn’t already getting tangled enough, huge screens and hi-def viewing allow an audience to essentially feel as if they are watching a scene from natural life.

Given all this, I do believe the lines between life and art certainly are a lot fuzzier than we want to think. There is even a skill in how real things are shown on TV – a single football game is included in numerous cameras constantly capturing different angles and emphasizing different players, what is mike myers net worth with various levels of zoom. Individuals who edit all of this footage have to create rapid decisions by what to show and what not to show.

As a viewer, you’re also starting to have more choices about your own personal “edits.” When you have the NFL Sunday Ticket, you will know that you could choose to follow along with certain players. By selecting what highlights to view, you’re taking a dynamic role in “editing” real life because it happens. I’m not wanting to draw any weighty conclusions, but I do believe it adds a new level of enjoyment to flipping in your television once you finally observe that art is life and life is art.

Leave a Reply